Tuesday, March 01, 2005

More Juicy Deets on Jerry's loser/poser status

Read the deets below from a fellow e-stalker.

Hey, Someone posted this inside scoop on the web: I know Jason Cerebone who is one of many producers on the show. What he FINALLY dished after last night was over. He said Jen was obviously infatuated with Jerry and wanted to give them a chance, although she immediately said it was going to be a "big leap of faith". They were scheduled for 3 rendevous dates/meetings during the 6 week production hiatus. After the first one, things seemed to be going well, although it was basically a release of physical tension/attractions. During the second rendevous in early December, they began to actually "talk" about who they really are, what their goals are etc. Jen flat out questioned Jerry's motives after seeing some of the production dailies and hearing the gossip about his past. Truth be told, he flat out told her his primary motives in moving to LA was to in fact develop a acting career, although that had no bearing on his decision and motives to do the bachelorette. Jen could not let that go. She was convinced that he used the show to his advantage and coupled with the fact that Jerry's gallery job was nothing more than working at the front desk and on overseeing the display crew (the ones who hang the art on the walls for shows) - she thought he was a phony. Many insiders felt it was more an issue of the fact that he has never really held a real job and is not a career or money focused. They mutually agreed to not bad mouth one another for the sake of their potential career goals. This took place in mid-January. This also explains Jen getting slightly frustrated with Jerry's acting surprised. Another thing that Jason said was that all 6 producers knew the outcome as did Chris Harrison and this was ironically the most difficult finale to keep under wraps due to the fact that Jen started behaving like a single girl in Chicago as early as Decemeber. And also was more visible than past bachelorettes to media questions.

1 comment:

David said...

Greate piece in the Times.

http://nytimes.com/2005/03/02/arts/television/02heff.html